"History is a guide to navigation in perilous times. History is who we are and why we are the way we are. History is not just the past. History is the present." ~David C. McCullough
Friday, April 3, 2020
COVID19 Hiatus
Thursday, March 19, 2020
What Ended the Great Depression?
Saturday, February 22, 2020
Book Cover Reveal
Tuesday, January 28, 2020
Life During the Great Depression
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
Book Update!!
Friday, January 17, 2020
Causes of Economic Decline and Crash in the 1920s
The stock market crash of 1929 was the worst economic crash in American history, carrying other countries to fall into economic downturns as well. According to history.com, the stock market crash began on Thursday, October 24, 1929 as stock investors traded a record 12.9 million shares. On October 28th, known as "Black Monday", the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 13% and then plunged another 12% the following day, on "Black Tuesday". While this economic crisis sent shockwaves throughout the country, there were signs that this crash was coming. The remainder of the this post will examine the causes of the inevitable stock market crash.
During the period of the Roaring Twenties, the economy and stock market expanded rapidly as the U.S. exited the Great War and entered into a period of manufacturing consumer goods rather than war goods and the introduction of buying on credit on a large scale, including the purchasing of stocks on margin.
From August 1921 through September 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average shot up, leading economists at the time to believe that the stock market had reached a permanently high plateau. The market officially reached its peak in September 1929 when the Dow Jones shot up to 381. By this point in history, even common working-class citizens became interested in the stock market and investing, and with the new purchasing power allotted to these workers in the booming economy, many were able to purchase stocks on margin, meaning they paid a small percentage of what the stock was worth and the bank or a broker lent the rest of the cost of the stock. Despite the purchasing of stocks on margin, which is undoubtedly one of the causes of the economic decline, the economy was in a boom cycle at the time--unemployment was down, purchasing power was up, and various industries were prosperous.
Although there is no one cause for the Great Depression, and economists and historians often debate about the primary cause, there are several theories as to the smaller bumps in the road which led to the Great Depression.
1. Overconfidence leading to a burst bubble--Just as the economy was on an uptick during much of the late 1990s through the mid-2000s, eventually leading to the crash of 2008, one of the causes of the Great Depression was overconfidence when it came to purchasing. Some economists and historians have argued that at the time of the crash, stock market prices were soaring to record highs (which can be both good and bad, as it would turn out), leading to a sense of overconfidence in how prosperous the U.S. economy was at the time as well as stocks being too expensive for many to purchase on their own without assistance from a broker or the bank. This led to an "asset bubble" which would burst.
2. Buying stocks "on margin"--With the economy on an uptick during the early 1920s, people who otherwise would not be able to purchase stocks and play the market were able to do so due to the ability to purchase stocks "on margin". This meant that rather than paying the full amount to purchase a stock, the buyer paid a percentage of the stock's cost while a bank or broker covered the remaining amount. This may have boost the stock market for a short time, but would have major repercussions in the wake of the stock market crash. When the crash occurred, millions of stock market shares became worthless and those who bought stocks "on margin" were saddled with debt they could not afford to repay.
Sunday, September 22, 2019
Constitutional and Legal Issues in the Roaring Twenties
The 1920s seemed like a carefree period in American history; flappers, speakeasies, jazz music, and lavish parties seem to flood one's thoughts when this time period is mentioned. However, many constitutional and legal issues divided Americans in the 1920s. Many of these issues reflected the struggle between modern and traditional values and highlighted how international affairs could have an affect on domestic policies and attitudes. For some Americans, these issues took the form of racism, nativism, and intolerances of differences in religion and politics. This post will examine such issues as the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan, the Red Scare, the Scopes trial, and restrictions on immigration.
The Red Scare, 1918-1919
The Red Scare was the imposition of stern measures to suppress dissent after World War I in a crusade aganst internal enemies. Fueled by the November 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, an uprising of Communists in Russia who overthrew the tsarist regime of the Romanov dynasty, the Red Scare targeted communists, socialists, anarchists, and others who were viewed as having un-American sentiments.
The Red Scare was led by Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer and was sparked by several events which took place shortly after WWI. Race riots erupted in 25 cities; a series of labor strikes in Boston, Massachusetts climaxed with a walkout by police; several unexplained bombings added to the mass hysteria. All of these events, although unconnected, were seen as part of a Communist conspiracy.
The Attorney General ordered the first of the so-called Palmer Raids in late 1919. In 33 cities across the country, police without warrents raided the headquarters of Communists and other organizations. Eventually, they arrested more than 4,000 people, holding them without charges and denying them legal counsel. Some 560 aliens were deported. Palmer's harsh tactics would turn the public against him and his raids would come to an end. However, the Palmer Raids would have a lasting effect on the general public throughout the 1920s--many Americans would be discouraged from speaking their minds freely in open debate, thus hindering their constitutinal right to freedom of speech.
Sacco and Vanzetti
Closely linked to the Red Scare was the case of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. These two Italian immigrants--and admitted anarchists--were convicted of murder in 1921 in connection with a Massachusetts robbery. Many people questioned the evidence against Sacco and Vanzetti, concluding that the two men were convicted more for their beliefs and Italian origin than for a crime. In spite of mass demonstrations and appeals, the two men were executed in 1927. The governor of Massachusetts eventually cleared the two men in 1977, 50 years after the fact.
The Resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan
Antiforeign nativist and racist attitudes encouraged a revival of the Ku Klux Klan. The first organization, active during the Reconstruction era, had died out in the late 1800s. A reorganized Klan, formed in 1915, grew slowly until 1920. In that year, it added 100,000 members, The Klan of the 1920s targeted not only African Americans but also Catholics, Jews, and immigrants. To the Klan, the only true Americans were white, Protestant, and American-born. In 1925, membership in the Klan peaked at 2 millop.
Restrictions on Immigration
The nativism and racism of the 1920s that was evident in the Red Scare, the Sacco and Vanzetti case, and the resurgence of the Klan was also present in immigration legislation of the era. Immigration had resumed after World War I, but there was less of a need for workers. In the postwar recession, immigrants were seen as taking jobs from returning American GIs and somehow threatened American values. The nativist climate led to the Immigration Act of 1924. This act established a system of national quotas, which limited the number of immigrants from each country. These quotas deliberately kept the totals for eastern and southern Europe low and excluded all immigration from Asia.
The Scopes Trial
The Scopes Trial, also known as the Monkey Trial, began on July 10, 1925. The defendant, John Thomas Scopes, was a high school science teacher who taught evolution in the classroom, which was said to violate the Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of any theory that went against biblical doctrine or denied the theory of creationism.
From the website historynet.com: "The trial took place in Dayton, Tennessee, and was the result of a carefully orchestrated series of events that were intended to bring publicity, and therefore money, into the town by a group of local businessmen. In reality, Scopes was unsure of whether he had ever technically taught the theory of evolution, but he had reviewed the chapter in the evolution chapter in the textbook with students, and he agreed to incriminate himself so that the Butler Act could be challenged by the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union). Several students were encouraged to testify against Scopes at the trial.
The Scopes Trial brought in hundreds of reporters from all over the country, and it was the first trial to be broadcast on radio. Both the prosecuting attorney and Scopes’ defense attorney were charismatic men and drew significant attention to the case, which for the defense was more about defeating the Butler Act then about defending Scopes. Scopes was found guilty and charged a fine of $100, but the verdict was thrown out on a technicality on an appeal. For the next few years, textbooks in Tennessee had all mention of evolution removed. The Butler Act was repealed in 1967."
These dilemmas brought to light some of the underlying issues in a country that otherwise seemed prosperous. However, dark times were ahead for Americans. Next time, we're going to examine the 1929 stock market crash.
Thursday, September 19, 2019
Prohibition
Monday, September 16, 2019
The Emergence of the New Woman
Saturday, September 14, 2019
Stock Market Speculation and Mass Conspicious Consumption of the 1920s
The period of the 1920s is known as a time of illegal gin, speakeasies, flappers, and mass conspicuous consumption as purchasing power had increased and people were investing in the stock market. Like every time period, there were pros and cons to the 1920s, and this post will examine stock market speculation and the rise of mass consumerist culture in the United States in the 1920s.
Stock Market Speculation
The postwar period of economic recovery and its return to normalcy helped to produce a surge of investment in the stock market. Optimistic business leaders and government leaders alike saw no end to this new economic boom and encouraged everyone to buy into the bull market of the time; some families invested their life savings into the stock market, and while the profits rolled in, these families experienced an increase in wealth for a while.
The new wealth that flowed from the stock market was built on a deeply flawed structure. Many of these stocks were bought on margin, which meant that buyers could purchase stocks by making only small down payments in cash, sometimes as low as 5% of the value of the stocks. The rest of the money used to purchase the stock(s) was/were borrowed from brokers and those who borrowed the money counted on their profits to repay their loans. This systemof purchasing on margin worked as long as the profits continued to flow.
Mass Consumption
The 1920s were a time of mass consumption--huge quantities of manufactured goods were available and many people had more money to spend on those goods. The mass production and consumption of these new goods and services, particularly in the automobile industry, electrical industry, and the radio and motion picture industry had effects on the American way of life.
The automotive industry stimulated the steel, rubber, paint, glass, and oil industries. The industry accelerated a middle class move to the suburbs that fueled a real estate boom and would expand cities into urban centers as more people would have the ability to commute to the cities from the suburbs and urban locales. This expansion of cities and suburban areas stimulated the development of services such as gas stations, motels, supermarkets, and shopping centers. At the same time, the automobile industry would lead to the need for highways and would negatively impact railroad construction and use. The automobile industry would have an interesting effect on social equality; women would gain more independence with the ability to purchase and drive automobiles, changing family life as it meant more women could work outside of the house and could even travel larger distances for work; and the low prices of automobiles meant that Americans of varying income levels had the accessability to purchase them.
The electrical industry changed homes, businesses, and cities through the introduction of the electric light, this helped double business productivity through electric power as well as transform life and leisure through the introduction of home goods such as electric washing machines, stoves, vacuum cleaners, refigerators, and irons. The electric industry connected people and eased rural isolation through the use of the telephone.
The radio and motion picture industry helped to ease regional differences and homogenzie American culture, helped to end rural isolation, helped popularize ragtime and jazz music, it provided an outlet for advertising, increased interest in politics and spectator sports, and created nationally known and recognized celebrities.
Role of Technology
Technology, combined with new marketing strategies, transformed American society in the 1920s. Led by Henry Ford and the automobile industry, mass production and the moving assembly line resulted in uniform products produced at lower costs.
These new technologies made possible a consumer-oriented economy, one in which more goods, costing less, were available to more Americans. Encouraged by a boom in advertising, families spent a smaller portion of their income on necessities and a larger portion on new comsumer goods such as appliances, radios, and reay-to-wear clothing. Often these goods were purchased over time through installment payments.
Growing Cultural Homogenization
The new technology introduced during this era also made American cultre more homogenous. Americns from one coast to the other tended to use the same products, wear the same clothing styles, see the same movies, and listen to the same music, just as they do today. Regional and class differences were blurred and individualism became less important than conformity.
This growth in cultural homogenization led to a shift in cultural values. As America became an urban, industrialized nation, changes in lifestyle, values, morals, and manners increased tension and conflict. Wealth, possessions, having fun, and sexual freedom were the new values which led to Americans having more leisure time and the rise of cultural movements such as the Harlem Renaissance.
Lerisure: With a shorter work week and with more paid vacation time, Americans had more leisure time. Americans consumed popular culture such as movies, spectator sports, listened to music on the radio and records, and played games.
Flappers: With the dichotomy of growing cultural homogenization and a shift in American cultural values, women gained notoriety during this era for embracing the change in culture towards a more sexually free society. The popular image of young women in the 1920s was that of the flapper, a young, pretty woman with bobbed hair who wore shortened dresses. The flapper drank alcohol, smoked, and she thought for herself. She was featured in movies, magazines, advertising, and novels. She was an expression of women's new sense of independence, a statement of change in American culture, and even rebellion. The image of the flapper often represented an example in the debate over traditional values versus modern values that was dividing the nation.
Literature: The conflict and concern created by the debate over traditional values versus modern values in America also saw expression in literature. American writers of the 1920s protested the effects of technology and mass consumption. They criticized the business mentality, the confority of the times, and the preoccupation with material things. Some writers, such as Ernest Hemingway (A Farewell to Arms, The Old Man and the Sea, For Whom the Bell Tolls, The Sun Also Rises, and more) became expatriates. Often referred to as the Lost Generation, these writers of the 1920s produced some of the most enduring works of American literature. Other great American writers of this era include F. Scott Fitzgerald, Langston Hughes, and Edith Wharton.
Harlem Renaissance: One of the most influential cultural movements of the 1920s was the Harlem Renaissance, led by a group of African American writers in the New York City neighborhood of Harlem. These creative intellectuals--mainly well-educated members of the middle class--felt alienated from the society of the 1920s. In their works they called for action against bogotry and expressed pride in African American culture and identity. Outstanding literary figures of the Harlem Renaissance include W.E.B. Du Bois, Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston, and Alain Locke.
The Great Depression of the 1930s ended the Harlem Renaissance, cutting the sales of books and literary magazines. However, during the civil rights movement of the 1960s, the writers of the Harlem Renaissance and their works would attract renewed interest and popularity.
African American artists, musicians, and dancers also participated in the Harlem Renaissance. Black musicians in the South blended elements of African, European, and American music to create the distinctive sounds of jazz and blues. This music was carried all over the country and even abroad.
The 1920s was a period of mass consumerism and played a major role in the creation of a uniform American culture. As the general public experienced an increase in their wealth, they experienced an increase in leisure and pleasure. However, this was also an era in which marginalized groups such as women faced changing roles in society. Next time on the blog, we will examine women's changing roles in society in the 1920s.
The 1920s: Business Boom or False Prosperity?
![]() |
| President Calvin Coolidge. Source: Wikipedia. |
Thursday, July 18, 2019
War and Prosperity
While transportation and communications technology served to unite the nation, a clash of values between the new urban-centered life and the legacy of the traditional rural life caused uneasiness and conflict. In addition, all Americans did not share in the good times. Beneath the surface was an economy with structural flaws that brought the Roaring Twenties to an abrupt end with the stock market crash in October 1929.
The Impact and Aftermath of War
World War I triggered a number of important changes in American society, most notably for some women and for many immigrants and African-Americans. Some changes were subtle and gradual while others were immediate and dramatic.
As many men went off to fight in Europe, the roles and responsibilities of women were affected. Their family responsibility increased. They contributed to the war effort as volunteers. Some women went to work in male-dominated fields, such as workers in weapons and munitions factories. Many women served overseas with the Red Cross and Salvation Army. Most, however, worked in traditionally female jobs, for which there was an increased demand. Contrary to popular belief, only about five percent of the women who entered the wartime workforce were new to working outside of the home. At war's end, with the return of male workers, women were expected to quit their jobs or to return to more traditional female work. Between 1910 and 1920, only 500,000 more women were added to the workforce.
The war had harsh consequences for immigrant families. Further immigration to the United States came to a screeching halt. About 18 percent of the American troops were foreign-born. However, many immigrant families already in the country faced fierce social and job discrimination in an antiforeign climate whipped up by the war.
Most African-American civil rights leaders supported World War I, and some 400,000 African-Americans served in the war. African-American soldiers were assigned to segregated units and often worked as laborers. Discrimination in the military was common during this time. Where African-Americans saw combat, they served with distinction. Several African-American regiments who fought alongside French troops were honored by the nation. Upon returning home, many African-American soldiers questioned why the liberties and freedoms they had fought to preserve in Europe were denied to them in their own country.
Monday, July 8, 2019
The Search for Peace
Hello readers! It's been quite a while since I last wrote here on the blog. I've been busy putting together my manuscript for The History Press, and I am happy to announce that my manuscript has been submitted for publication. It still amazes me that I was given this great opportunity to make my dream of becoming a historian come true. I will continue to keep you all updated as to the status of my book as it moves through the channels and will let you all know when it becomes available.
In the meantime, let's pick up where we left off...
World War I ended with an Allied victory in November 1918. The United States, particularly President Woodrow Wilson, played a role in the peacemaking process. Wilson had first suggested his own peacemaking proposals in January 1918, known as the Fourteen Points. To summarize, Wilson's Fourteen Points included: open, not secret, diplomacy; freedom of the seas; removal of trade barriers; arms reduction; self-determination of peoples (letting various national groups make their own political decisions); and the creation of an "association of nations" to guarantee political independence and territorial integrity.
Wilson's Fourteen Points became the basis for the peace negotiations that would be held in Versailles, France beginning in January 1919. Wilson led the American delegation, being the first president of the United States to leave American soil while in office.
Many of the Eurolean nations, who had suffered far greater than the United States, were not fully on board with Wilson's Fourteen Points. They wanted to be repaid for some of their losses they had suffered during the war, and some had even made secret wartime deals involving territorial changes and money settlements that contradicted provisions of the Fourteen Points.
The most important agreement reached at Versailles was the treaty with Germany, the Treaty of Versailles. According to its provisions, Germany had to do the following: accept complete responsibility for causing the Great War; pay huge reparations to the Allies; give up its military forces; cede lands to the new nations of Poland and Czechoslovakia; and give up its overseas colonies.
Wilson opposed many of the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles and treaties with the other Central Powers; however, he was willing to compromise because the treaties provided for a new world organization, the League of Nations, a predecessor to the United Nations. Wilson believed that the League of Nations would correct any problems caused by the peace treaties.
The League of Nations
The United States Senate had to approve the Treaty of Versailles that included the League of Nations, and it was there that Wilson was truly met with opposition. Wilson had angered Republicans by excluding them from the American delegation to the Versailles Conference yet Republicans held a majority of seats in the Senate. Wilson and the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Henry Cabot Lodge distrusted a d disliked one another. It was this hostility that was a major factor in the failure to compromise.
Isolationists in the Senate worried that joining the League of Nations would involve the United States in future foreign wars. They feared, for example, that the United States might be obligated to furnish troops to defend member nations.
Wilson stubbornly refused to allow any but the most minor of changes to the Treaty of Versailles, becoming increasingly moralistic and uncompromising.
When Wikson went on a speaking tour to gain popular support for the treaty, he collapsed and suffered a stroke. His illness thereafter prevented him from playing an active role in the treaty debate. The Senate voted several times on the Treaty of Versailles but always defeated it. The United States made a separate peace with Germany, and never did jojn the League of Nations. Fundamentally, the nation had voted to retain its traditional foreign policy of preferring non intervention and of acting alone when it did choose to play a role.
The Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
Although the United States failed to join the League of Nations, there was still great concern in the United States about keeping the peace. During the Paris Peace Conference, for example, many American women met with others from around the world to form the Women's International League for Peace and Feeedom. The WILPF opposed peace terms that would create additional, hostility among nations. The organization opposed the Treaty of Versailles for that reason, suggesting that its legacy would only be more war. The WILPF and other peace organizations wanted disarmament, arms control, and neutrality.
Reparations and War Debts
In 1914, the US had been a debtor nation, meaning that it owed more money to foreign nations than those nations owed to the US. After WWI, however, the US became the world's leading creditor nation, meaning that other countries owed more to the US than the US owed to them. The US was also the world's leading industrial producer, exporter, and financier. These changes were due in large part to money from the payment of war debts owed to this nation from the other Allied powers.
During WWI, the European Allies borrowed a great deal of money from the US in order to buy war supplies from American manufacturers. After the war, these debts became a source of conflict; European nations argued that their debts should be forgiven because while the US had contributed money, Europe had paid a heavy price in lives lost. Despite these arguments, the US demanded repayment anyway.
A factor that made repayment difficult was the US protectionist policy. High American tariffs limited European trade with the US and thus reduced earnings that might have been used to pay off war debts. These same tariffs also led to retaliation by 26 nations, most of which would raise their own tariff rates.
One step aimed at making repayment easier was the Dawes Plan, adopted in 1924. Under this plan, the US lent funds to Germany so that it could make war reparations--money it owed to European Allies as payment for economic losses during the war; the Allies would, in turn, use the funds to make payments on the war debts they owed the US.
Steps Towards Peace and Arms Control
In 1921, President Warren G. Harding hosted the Washington Naval Conference. The US, Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan agreed to set limits on the number of warships each nation could build. They also pledged to keep the peace in Asia and to protect the independence of China. The conference, however, failed to establish any means of enforcement.
In 1928, 15 nations meet in Paris to sign the Kellogg-Briand Pact, which outlawed war except in self-defense. Enforcement provisions were missing from the Pact, which 60 nations eventually signed.
Although these moves towards peace would not last, the US would see an era of prosperity, and that's what we'll cover in the next post here on The Half-Pint Historian Blog.
Friday, April 26, 2019
The Effects of the Great War
Hello readers! This post is an important one because we'll be wrapping up the series of WWI posts by examining the effects the war had on the world. So, without further ado, let's get started.
World War I was a devastating war, the effects of which are still being felt 100 years after its conclusion. The Great War was the deadliest war involving multiple countries, with over 9 million military personnel deaths and over 7 million men left permanently disabled. The Great War was the most expensive war up until that point. The Great War also boasted the most advanced weaponry than any war that came before it, with war goods such as tanks, submarines, air planes, poison gas, machine and gatling guns, and various other artillery forms being the norm on the battlefields. Given this information, it's no surprise that the effects of the war are still being felt a century later; however, what were done specific effects of the war?
- The conclusion of the war saw the downfall of four longstanding monarchies: Austria-Hungary, Germany, Turkey, and Russia.
- The war made people more open and accepting of other ideologies such as the Bolsheviks, communism, socialism, and fascism.
- The conclusion of WWI effectively marked an end to colonialism, with revolts to end colonialism in Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Middle East as people became more nationalistic.
- The Great War was the most costly war of the time, leaving European countries deep in debt and making the United States the leading creditor in the world; thus, the war shifted the economic balance of power.
- As a leading aggressor in the war, Germany's economy suffered greatly after the war and Germany had to pay reparations, which led the economy to suffer further.
- With soldiers traveling from country to country, influenza spread, killing 25 million people worldwide.
- Due to the methods of war that were used in WWI, countries became embittered and it became evident that a governing body was necessary to promote security and peace worldwide, so the League of Nations was formed.
- The war promoted research in the fields of technology, transportation, and communication.
- The war promoted social changes, such as women's suffrage and labor laws, to improve living standards and quality of life.
There are many other effects that can be attributed to the Great War, but regardless of how long or short that list is, what is certain is that the world was never the same again.
Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Ten Important Battles of the Great War
Hello readers! It's been a few months since I last posted here in the blog. I wish I could say I've been up to some exciting stuff lately, but I've just been busy with my full-time job, preparing for my summer job, and finishing up my manuscript for The History Press.
The previous few blog posts have been about World War I, and this post is no different.
World War I was a major conflict that had some devastating effects, but before we can discuss those, we should discuss some of the significant battles of the war. I'm by no means a military historian, so I'm posting a link to an article written by staff members of the Imperial War Museums in the United Kingdom. Below is the link to the article:
https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/10-significant-battles-of-the-first-world-war
Saturday, January 12, 2019
Preparing for War: The U.S. Before Entering WWI
![]() |
| Source: Mary Harrsch, Mural of Trench Warfare of WWI at Bardstown, Kentucky; https://www.flickr.com/photos/mharrsch/2337046167/ |
Wartime Constitutional Issues
As the U.S. prepared for war, there continued to be opposition to the nation's entry and to the role the U.S. would play in the role.
Many people, including notable Americans of the time such as Progressives Jane Addams and Robert La Follette, were against the U.S. entry into the First World War. Due to the widespread opposition, the vote to declare war followed intense congressional debate. Once committed to the war effort, however, the nation's social climate was one of patriotism and nativism.
These emotions sometimes led to actions that restricted some people's civil rights, usually in the name of national security. In addition to those of German background and immigrants in general, socialists, pacifists, and anyone who questioned the war, became suspect as possible traitors. Nativism was expressed in a 1917 law passed over President Wilson's veto that required a literacy test for immigrants. The law's objective was to restrict immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe; however, it turned out that most immigrants could read and write, if not in English than in their native language.
The emotions of patriotism and nativism would also lead to the passing of two broadly worded acts which served to control and punish those who opposed the war effort. The Espionage Act of 1917 made it a crime to interfere with the draft and allowed the postmaster general to bar "treasonous" materials from the mail. The Sedition Act of 1918 made it a crime to speak or publish anything "disloyal, profane...or abusive" about the government, Constitution, flag, or military services of the United States.
Under these acts, the government prosecuted more than 2,000 Americans and sent 1,500 of them to jail. Pacifists, socialists, and others seen as extremists suffered the most. A special target was the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), a radical union active in the West. Its leaders were arrested, its strikes broken up, and many of its members interred.
In 1918, the Sedition Act of 1918 was up for question as, just like previous stated, the Act made it a crime to speak or publish anything that could be seen as disloyal about the government, Constitution, war effort, etc. In a court case known as Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that free speech could, in fact, be limited during wartime. In a unanimous decision, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, "Free speech would not protect a man from falsely shouting 'fire' in a theater and causing a panic". Holmes would go on to say that Congress has the right to prevent words that would cause a "clear and present danger". That same year, the Supreme Court would also uphold the Sedition Act.
The actions the U.S. would take towards the war effort would seem to have been worth it, as the First World War would result in an Allied victory in November 1918. However, this series of posts on WWI is not yet finished. Next time on the blog, we'll examine some of the major battles of World War I.
Monday, December 10, 2018
Causes of WW1 for the United States
The Great War, or World War I, officially began in Europe in 1914, the United States would remain neutral until joining the war effort in 1917(with the war ending in 1918). This post will examine and provide details into the factors that caused the United States to enter the war and why they chose to ally with the Triple Entente.
Summary -- War broke out in Europe in July 1914 after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne. Due to the alliance system that existed at the time, most European nations joined the conflict while the U.S., under the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, remained neutral until 1917 when the country was drawn into the war due to a series of factors.
Cultural and Ethnic Links -- Despite the U.S. as a country remaining neutral for much of the war, few Americans remained truly neutral. Some people sympathized with the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy) because of familial and/or ancestral ties to those nations or because of a hatred of one or more of the nations in the Triple Entente (France, Britain, and Russia). The majority of Americans, however, favored the Triple Entente due to long-standing connections with Britain.
Economic Links -- The U.S. links to the Triple Entente/Allied Powers were economic as well as cultural. The British would blockade the North Sea which ended the U.S.'s export trade agreements with Germany which would drop in value from $345 million in 1914 to $29 million in 1916; however, the U.S.'s trade agreements with the nations of the Triple Entente increased exponentially. American business and agriculture, particularly benefited from this trade as much of it was financed by U.S. government loans to the Allied nations, totalling more than $2 billion by 1917.
Most Americans did not believe that the trade agreements and lending of money with the Allied powers violated the nation's neutrality in the war. At this time, many of those in Wilson's cabinet were in favor of siding with the Triple Entente. Wilson's slogan for his second presidential campaign boasted this false neutrality: "He kept us out of war". Although many Americans still believed the country was neutral despite its economic ties with the Allies, the Triple Alliance (also known as the Central Powers) thought otherwise.
German Submarine Warfare -- In order to fight against the British blockade and to attempt to stop trade between the Allied Powers and the U.S., the German armed forces declared a war zone around Britain in 1915. German u-boats, or submarines, would sink enemy ships in the war zone. Germany announced that in order to avoid attack, neutral nations and their citizens should refrain from entering the war zone; this would supposedly prevent attacks done in error due to mistaken identity. At the time, the international rules for marine warfare required that a warship stop and identify itself before boarding a merchant/passenger ship, removing its crew and passengers, and finally sink it. However, Germany ignored these international laws.
Germany's indiscriminate sinking of ships in order to destroy the Britiah blockade and its sinking of ships from Allied nations was the primary reason for the U.S. entry into the Great War. President Wilson argued for the freedom of the seas, insisting that America, as a neutral nation, had the right to trade with nations at a time of war. Freedom of the seas also meant that in times of peace there should be unrestricted travel of civilians in international waters and that in times of war, citizens of neutral nations should be free to travel.
Germany's response to this would lead the U.S. into the war in 1917.
* On February 1, 1917, Germany released it's new policy of unrestricted submarine warfare. Germany warned that it would attack ships without warning the vessels that were headed for Allied ports. Germany believed, at this point, that the war was at a stalemate; they knew this policy could bring the U.S. into the war but had hoped that they could break the British blockade before the U.S. could get troops to the battlefield.
* Two days later, on February 3, the U.S. broke diplomatic relations with Germany. In March, tensions between the U.S. and Germany grew with the discovery of the Zimmermann Note. This note was a message from the German foreign secretary, Arthur Zimmermann, to the German minister to Mexico urging a German military alliance with Mexico--if the Mexicans helped the Central Powera, Germany promised to support Mexico in regaining their lost territory in the southwestern U.S.
* Five U.S. merchant ships were sunk by the Germans in March 1917.
* Also in March, the Russian Revolution overthrew Czar Nicholas II and the Romanov dynasty, Russia's ruling class for 500 years before its fall. At the time, it appeared that more democratic forces would take control; if the U.S. went to war, it would attempt to make Russia an ally as the U.S. would join an alliance with other democratic nations.
With the Great War a century in our past, it's important to look back on the causes for the war and the reasons why the various nations, including our own, eca e involved in the conflict. Next time here on the blog, we're going to examine the various roles that the U.S. played in the war and in future posts we'll examine the key battles and why they were so devastating.
Saturday, November 10, 2018
Causes of World War I in Europe
This month, we celebrate Veterans Day on 11/11. Fighting in World War I ended at 11am on November 11, 1918. To look back on this day as a day of remembrance, The Half-Pint Historian is continuing to take a look at the causes of World War I in Europe. Let's do this!
![]() |
| Soldiers in WWI; photo from www.todayifoundout.com |
As the early 1900s began, people in Europe had enjoyed nearly a century of relative peace; however, at this time, forces were pushing the continent towards the brink of war. Nationalistic feelings, a glorification of the military, imperial rivalries, and tangled alliances all led to unrest in Europe. The war was sparked in the Balkans, where the Ottoman Empire had once maintained control, and soon all of Europe was at war. This post will explore the causes of the Great War in Europe prior to the entrance of the United States.
Causes
Although the world seemed at peace in the early 1900s, a series of powerful forces were at play that would drive the world to the brink of war.
- Nationalism--a feeling of pride in, and devotion to, one's country
- Militarism--the glorification of military power
- Imperialism (and Economic Rivalry)--when a country increases their power and wealth by bringing additional territories under control
- Alliance systems--a network of agreements, treaty, and ententes
- Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand
Global Concerns in the Cold War Part II
Hello readers! It's been a while since I last posted an update here on the blog. Since my last post, I submitted my second manuscript to...
-
The Columbian Exchange is a term coined by ecologist and historian Alfred Crosby to describe the profound transformation of bot...
-
Native American cultures before 1492 were diverse, dynamic, and interconnected. They shared a general world view--animism (the attrib...
-
The period of the 1920s is known as a time of illegal gin, speakeasies, flappers, and mass conspicuous consumption as purchasing power had i...


